When we read, another person thinks for us: we merely repeat his mental process. (…) For the more one reads the fewer are the traces left of what one has read; the mind is like a tablet that has been written over and over. Hence it is impossible to reflect; and it is only by reflection that one can assimilate what one has read if one reads straight ahead without pondering over it later, what has been read does not take root, but is for the most part lost. Indeed, it is the same with mental as with bodily food: scarcely the fifth part of what a man takes is assimilated; the remainder passes off in evaporation, respiration, and the like.
While talking meetings have much merit — when planned well they can be efficient and offer a level of comfort in speaking in person — they can also be subject to a host of problems: one person dominating, others checking out and multitasking, side conversations, straying off course, and pressures to conform to the boss’s ideas.
one person dominating –› this is probably one of the reasons why meetings are so counterproductive
from Hypothesis Stream https://ift.tt/3teW4xW
Reading “Annotation” by Remi Kalir & Antero Garcia
– Good Morning Susie Soho
whenever deconstruction finds a nutshell – a secure axiom or a pithy maxim – the very idea is to crack it open and disturb this tranquility
John Caputo in Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida